Thursday, October 20, 2016

Judge Roy Moore Unlawfully Removed

 Image result for ten commandments images public domain alabama supreme court


Thursday, October 20, 2016

THE CRUCIFIXION OF JUDGE ROY MOORE
Exclusive: Matt Barber slams 'anti-Christian' SPLC Follow Barber on Twitter.


Under the “progressive” leadership of Barack Obama and his like-minded “social justice” warriors throughout all levels of government, we have entered an era of lawlessness unprecedented in American history. This is no more apparent than in Alabama where Chief Justice Roy Moore of the Alabama Supreme Court has been unlawfully removed from the bench at the hands of liberal activists on Alabama’s Court of the Judiciary (COJ). The case is under appeal. This miscarriage of justice was carried out at the behest of the left-wing extremist Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), an anti-Christian activist organization that seeks to undermine, if not extinguish altogether, the free exercise of religion as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.   .

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING  

Days of Elijah

Monday, October 17, 2016

Planned Parenthood Baby Organ Distributors Prosecuted

Liberty Counsel

  Contact:
  Public Relations Department
 
407-875-1776 office
  407-462-9715 cell
  Media@LC.org



Following taken directly from Liberty Counsel press release


October 17, 2016

SANTA ANA, CA -- The Orange County District Attorney's office filed a lawsuit against DaVinci Biosciences and DV Biologics, two sister biological supply companies, accusing them of selling fetal-derived cells and tissues at unlawfully high markups around the world. The suit demands that the companies stop the sale of aborted baby tissue and cells and reimburse researchers who overpaid.

In the 21-page civil complaint, the district attorney's office charges unlawful and unfair business practices against DV Biologics, DaVinci Biosciences, Andres Isaias, Estefano Isaias, Sr. and Estefano Isaias, Jr.  DaVinci Biosciences is jointly owned and operated by all three of the accused. Two of the three accused also own and manage DV Biologics. The two companies share the same office space, employees and management. There is no separate accounting of the financials, revenue and expenses as both companies are 100 percent commingled.
The suit alleges that the companies obtained aborted baby body parts from Planned Parenthood and sold tissues and stem cells from these aborted babies, earning hundreds of thousands in revenue from 2009 to 2015. State and federal law permits the donation of fetal tissue for research but forbids its sale for fees beyond certain strict limits, such as fees for processing and handling costs. According to the district attorney's office, this suit pertains to "illegally selling hundreds of fetal tissue products for profit."
Here are some examples of unborn baby parts that DaVinci Biosciences and DV Biologics sold at a profit margin of 70 percent or more: 
  • Heart - up to $674 in profit
  • Liver - up to $233 in profit      
  • Stomach - up to $221 in profit
  • Small Intestine - up to $664 in profit

DaVinci Biosciences and DV Biologics higher mark-up over their costs included inflated packaging, handling fees and shipping fees. Prices were intentionally set as high as possible to leave room to offer discounts and negotiate a lower price so as to ensure a profit on sales even with discounts. For example, the companies apparently charged as much as $700 per vial for tissue that cost only $20 to process. The same product was often randomly sold to different customers at different prices. U.S. customers and educational institutions were typically charged the highest prices whereas the deepest discounts were offered to international distributors around the world.
The companies also hired an outside marketing consultant to develop marketing materials, including a catalog, to support their sales effort for prenatal products made from fetal heart, brain, lungs, kidneys, liver, large intestines, small intestines, skin, skeletal muscle and bones.
Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel said, "This is atrocious. These companies are making outrageous profits from killing babies. Our client, Sandra Merritt, was one of the journalists who blew the whistle on Planned Parenthood's corrupt practice of harvesting baby parts and greedily selling them. Liberty Counsel stands with her and supports this lawsuit by the Orange County District Attorney's office. The time for butchering precious babies and profiting from this human genocide must end."
DaVinci Biosciences and DV Biologics higher mark-up over their costs included inflated packaging, handling fees and shipping fees. Prices were intentionally set as high as possible to leave room to offer discounts and negotiate a lower price so as to ensure a profit on sales even with discounts. For example, the companies apparently charged as much as $700 per vial for tissue that cost only $20 to process. The same product was often randomly sold to different customers at different prices. U.S. customers and educational institutions were typically charged the highest prices whereas the deepest discounts were offered to international distributors around the world.
The companies also hired an outside marketing consultant to develop marketing materials, including a catalog, to support their sales effort for prenatal products made from fetal heart, brain, lungs, kidneys, liver, large intestines, small intestines, skin, skeletal muscle and bones.
About Liberty Counsel: 
Liberty Counsel is an international nonprofit, litigation, education, and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of life, and the family since 1989, by providing pro bono assistance and representation on these and related topics.
© Copyright 2016 Liberty Counsel. All rights reserved




Image result for planned parenthood abortion images
Tthelastbastille.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/abortion/







Wednesday, October 5, 2016

Centuries of aggression against Christians bring about the Crusades


Siege of Antioch
"The Crusades were but a temporary setback to Islamic expansion, and the source of endless arguments that sought to establish some moral equivalence between Muslims and Christians at first, and eventually to elevate the former to victimhood and condemn the latter as aggressors. 
The Battle of Manzikert
Far from being wars of aggression, the Crusades were a belated military response of Christian Europe to over three centuries of Muslim aggression against Christian lands, the systemic mistreatment of the indigenous Christian population of those lands, and harassment of Christian pilgrims. 
Philip of France and the Third Crusade
The postmodern myth, promoted by Islamic propagandists and supported by some self-hating Westerners--notably in the academy--claims that the peaceful Muslims, native to the Holy Land, were forced to take up arms in defense against European-Christian aggression.  This myth takes A.D. 1095 as its starting point, but it ignores the preceding centuries, starting with the early caliphs, when Muslim armies swept through the Byzantine Empire, conquering about two-thirds of the Christian world of that time."  Taken from The Sword of the Prophet, Serge Trifkovic, Regina Orthodox Press, Inc., 2002, pg. 97



Blog Archive

About Author of This Blog